Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Doing it wrong

Hello...*sneeze*

Whoops, I let it get a little dusty in here hey?

It's been a while. *sheepish grin*

I'm sorry. I've been...busy.

I know its no excuse but, what can I say? Sometimes its just hard to do take care of everything in a day. 24 hours is not enough you know. They should really speak to someone about extending that...I mean, who needs sleep? Really.

In one of my classes today, we had a lesson on journal writing. I know, can you believe it? Journal writing. As part of our internship and research, we must submit a reflective journal detailing our experiences and thoughts of the organisation which we've worked with. Journals are huge with arts and cultural studies and practice, good thing I love keeping one. Works for me.

We were given a instructive course on good Journal maintenance. Seems pretty straight forward but you would be surprised at how the concept of keeping a journal escapes people. At least it surprised me. I've been a journal writer since I was four. Nothing to be impressed about, I could barely write let alone spell, but the practice and general intention was there.

Apparently it's good practice to write in your journal everyday for at least 10- 15 minutes. You must be frank and honest. You must not delay or procrastinate with your writing. And most importantly, you must write in the same bound book every entry--meaning no writing anything down on a random piece of paper only to paste it in later.

I thought about my personal journal, my blogs, and my writing habits in general...

Nothing like a short course in: "You're doing it wrong."

:-/

Sunday, February 28, 2010

What Australian Television?

To quote a friend's facebook status:

"H------ C------ knows that she just wasted 2 hours of her life watching the Maria Korp story. But it does beg the question, WHAT THE HELL IS WITH AUSTRALIAN TELEVISION."

I was asking myself the very same question this morning. I believe that in an earlier post I made a complaint against the Australian content free to air viewers are subjected to on commercial channels.

In recent years we've seen Channel 9 recycle it's 'Underbelly' series like its going out of fashion, Channel 10 hoeing into reality television competitions that they are beginning to cross pollinate, and Channel 7 making their own generic versions of the same shit. The latest offering to come from them is "The Bounce", a football variety show in the same guise of The Footy Show and that other show on Channel 10. 'The Bounce' will be hosted by Peter Helliar.

I am pretty close to throwing my television out of my window.

People! Join me on this one. I believe between the however many thousands of us combined, I am sure we have more than enough talent between us to write and produce original Australian content of some sort of integrity. Surely that's possible. Let's work together so that Peter Helliar doesn't have to. For the good of the country, let's make it so!




Monday, February 15, 2010

RE: Winter Olympics Coverage

Dear Channel 9,

First of all, may I congratulate you on taking the initiative of exclusively covering the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics for free to air television. I personally am a fan of the Winter Olympics and am excited to see it on my telly.

That's as far as that complement goes. That will also be my only compliment.

I'm basically looking for answers.

1. Who's responsible for putting together your "commentary team"?

Out of the 22 people you have on your "expert and opinion" panel, only 2 are actual winter Olympians. And even then, what expertise can they offer? I haven't seen any expert opinion from Alisa Camplin since her advice on chewing Extra for healthy teeth and guns. And Steven Bradbury? Really? I know Australians have a sense of humour and all but...really?

2. This is not so much a question as it is a fact: Gian Rooney and Grant Hackett are swimmers. Just thought you would like to know. You do realise the only water about this particular Olympics is ice and snow right?

3. What is it with you and the Stevanovic family? They've got dirt on you don't they? They've got photos of you in compromising positions, and threaten you with them everyday, don't they? I refuse to believe they actually qualify as journalists.

4. Mick Molloy is not funny, when will you learn?

5. My non-existent left nut knows more about the Winter Olympics than Eddie McGuire. Why? Why would you put him on there? Has he ever played a sport in his life? Honestly, what made you look at him and think: "Here's a guy who knows his winter sports." I doubt the man has built a snowman, and even if he has, I bet he was still confused over the process. He's a moron.

And finally, if I hear: "This is exactly the sort of pressure that Cathy Freeman was under", I swear to god...

Kind Regards,

V.



Saturday, January 30, 2010

Breast Feeding, get the fuck over it.

BREAST IS BEST --- FOR TEENS, TOO.

See that headline, and anyone's eye is bound to get caught on that. I must say, I was certainly intrigued. What did this headline mean? Was the article about teen pregnancy and the importance of breastfeeding, or was it a study that revealed that we should be breastfed up until our teens? Either way, I was confused--and disturbed, and so I clicked the link to find out more.

Lo and behold, it was another study to which highlighted the marvelous benefits of the tit and the milk it produces. Brilliant. Is there nothing that this milk can't do? Well, wash my car and cure cancer for one thing, but you know, that's beside the point. This recent study has revealed that the benefits of breastfeeding are long lasting enough to extend well into our teens. A study comparing siblings that were breastfed to those that were fed on formula showed that the breastfed babies had better chances of academic success in terms of completing high school and university. Furthermore, those who were fed on formula grew hunchbacks and lived in a cathedral destined to ring bells. Okay, I may have exaggerated that.

Now, apparently because this is the first study to use siblings as its research subjects, external uncontrolable influcences such as parental genetics and environmental influences did not have to be taken into account.

Give me a fucking break.

You know what got me through finishing high school and university? My mother's iron fist. Her tits had nothing to do with it. If I wagged school, if I produced average marks, if I did not have a career plan by the time I was 17, my mother would have my arse. And you know what? It worked. Not only have I finished high school, I'm also finishing a Masters degree and to top it all off, I grew up a formula baby. That's right you mothers, I was an S26 baby, and shock horror, I'm not deformed.

Other influences don't have to be taken into account my arse. What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Seriously, shove your study, there are more pressing matters at hand. Like the fact that after all this time, nobody can tell why Paula Abdul is dancing with a cartoon cat. Is it because she was, or wasn't breastfed?

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Over 100,000 people are feared dead in Haiti, and aid cannot come fast enough.

Tele-evangelist Pat Robertson claims that Haiti had it coming because they made a "pact with the devil."

I'd like to think of myself as an intelligent person. I usually can grasp the most complex of theories and what not, but I have gone through this "Robertson" logic and can still make no sense of it, perhaps you can help:

"Something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it...They were under the heel of the French ... and they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, 'We will serve you if you'll get us free from the French.' True story. And the devil said, 'OK, it's a deal,'..ever since, they have been cursed by one thing after another."

???

Robertson isn't the first to throw the 'they had it coming' line. When a devastating earthquake hit China in 2008, Sharon Stone piped up to say that it was all just a case of 'bad karma.' At a red carpet event, Sharon took time out of her self- indulgent day to grace us all with her words of wisdom:

"The Chinese have not been very nice to the Dalai Lama, who is a very good friend of mine... Then all this earthquake and all this stuff happened and I thought is that karma? When you're not nice, that the bad things happen to you?"

50 years old, and she sounds like she's still in kindergarten. Incidentally, I have also come across 5 year olds who have a more heightened sense of moral consciousness than Mr. Robertson.

However, I don't know what is more troubling: the fact that these people have a voice, or that there are hoards of people who agree with them.

But hey, apparently its all going to be OK, because Danni Minogue is pregnant and Kylie is just overjoyed.

*slaps forehead*

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Talent not essential

So the nominations of the BAFTA's (that's the British Academy of Film and Television Arts to you philistines) for The Orange Rising Star Award came out today. This award is a people's choice those who are nominated are usually bright young things who have made it onto our screens in the past few years.



Basically, it's a "congratulations, you're sort of a star, and a good actor" type of thing.

Lets take a look at the nominees.

There's Jesse Eisenberg (the dude off Zombieland), Nicholas Hoult (the kid from About a Boy...he's not a kid anymore), Carey Mulligan (some chick), Tahar Rahim (some frenchie) and Kristen Stewart--I'm sorry what?

Kristen Stewart?

This is an award for acting right? I mean, I know that Eisenberg kid isn't, like, the next Deniro or anything but does that mean that you've really got to vote for Kristen Stewart? Are you insane!?

You're nominating her for this right?



And this...



Oh, and lets not forget this little beauty!



Seriously? You're the British Academy of Film and Television Arts, and you call this your cream of the crop? For shame. Standards have drop low.

There is no such thing as art anymore, for she has bit her lip and died.

Monday, January 11, 2010

C to the O to the C to the K bags.

Question: How do you deal with confrontation?





I'm not talking about the tragic 'my boyfriend cheated on me with my best friend and I'm going to cut his balls off and kill the bitch' sort of confrontation. Obviously, those sorts of situations call for drastic action and reaction.





I'm more or less referring to small incidental 'hey don't be suck a cock-bag man' type confrontations.





Not long ago, I think it was the Saturday that had just passed, I found myself having brunch with a couple of friends at a place in Fitzroy. It was a hot day, we were all tired and grumpy, but we all persevered, because the food looked and smelled amazing. And it was. I had french toast with poached pears, vanilla bean yogurt and maple syrup. Yum yum. But although the food was great, the waiter was an arsehole, and just for no real reason at all, antagonizing someone on account of a food allergy, bumping into other customers and getting shirty with them for being in his way. You know, just a real prick.

That sort of stuff pisses me off.



Working in hospitality or retail is never easy, I know. You quickly loose your faith in humanity. People are rude to you and you're often the brunt of people's bad mood for no good reason at all. But despite all that, you're still nice to that customer. Why? Because at the end of the day, they're the ones putting money in my bank account. The way I see, small price to pay.



Which is why it pisses me off when I come across useless fuckwit service, and a waiter who's a dick and a smart arse. What's his excuse?

Did I confront him on his behaviour? No.

Did anyone else at the table? No.

What we did was smile to his face and then whisper as he walked away about what a wanker the guy was.



And why didn't we say something? What would have happened then? If we said: "No, we don't accept this "orange juice" that you've given us. It's not good enough that there was carrot and ginger residue in the juicer and that's why this orange juice does not look like orange juice, please go back and make a fresh one" would he have really thrown us out for that?

Why didn't we tell someone when we went to pay for our food that whilst the food was awesome, the particular waiter who served us wasn't? What's the worst that could have happened?

I suppose in cases like these, it's best to let sleeping dogs lie, maybe. A friend of mine had an incident were she received a pretty third rate breakfast after explicitly being refused her first order. She originally wanted to go with scrambled eggs with hollandaise sauce. The chef refused her order, claiming the hollandaise sauce will curdle in her stomach and make her sick. My was friend quite perplexed at this, as she has had the exact same order in other restaurants before with no hassle. Nonetheless, she opted for something else rather than make a fuss. What she then received was burnt toast, over cooked eggs and soggy sides. My friend ate what she could, paid for her meal, and then wrote a little note on a napkin for the chef saying that she was not pleased with her meal and would not be coming back again.

She was half- way down the street when the chef ran after her, waving the napkin in her face demanding an explanation.

Nothing really was resolved, my friend still walked away angry, and for all we know, the chef is still cooking the same crap not at all altered by any bad critique she may receive.

Today at the beach, however, I saw something inspirational. Being a hot day, it's safe to say that it was pretty crowded, and Half Moon Bay today was no exception. Of course, in any event, no matter where you are, you will always encounter a beef-cake pack of yahoos who strut around treating the beach more like their territory rather than a space to share with others. I could go into detail about the array of horrific tattoos and gold chains on display, but that's another rant entirely.

Quietly settling down to read my book, I have managed to block out most of the yahoo business and retreat into my own little world. Whilst there, I failed to notice that the group were making rather nasty pigs of themselves, and decided to throw their empty cigarette packs and ice- cream wrappers in the sand.

A young woman, having seen this, approached them and said, quite simply: "Excuse me fellas, but just letting you know, the bin's over there." And she pointed in the direction of the bins, which were a metre away.

The group then arched up. Their mentality was that nobody had the right to tell them what to do, least of all this girl. They threw their rubbish in a pile in front of her and said: "We've left this all just for you. You can clean it up if you like. Don't forget to take it with you when you leave alright baby!"

And with a "You're disgusting." She turned her back and walked away.

Nothing really was solved in her actions. The rubbish was still left there for someone to pick up, and the blokes still went about their business, thinking they were rightful kings of all they surveyed.

Thinking of the girl however, perhaps she feels a little better for having at least tried to have done something about it. She saw someone doing something she thought was wrong, and she spoke up. And even though she was rudely ridiculed without anybody defending her, she still stuck to her guns.

Maybe one of the pack will go home tonight feeling slightly ashamed for making a dick of themselves, but perhaps that is just too much to ask of some people.

One things for sure, I bet that girl is going to sleep well tonight having no regrets at all, and I retire inspired, just waiting to pounce on the next opportunity for a small confrontation.

Mind you, I'll probably go ape shit at some poor sod who doesn't really deserve it, but you know, baby steps with these things, baby steps.